Visionary Breakfast August 2026 : Bonsai Arrangement at the Bulgari Hotel - Tokyo Station - Capture by Manish Prabhune (CC 4.0 free to use)
“You don’t have to be NUMBER ONE. Strive to be the SPECIAL AND ONLY ONE.” That is SMAP’s 2003 hit Sekai ni Hitotsu Dake no Hana. IRONICALLY the single reached number one on the Oricon yearly singles chart and became one of the best-selling physical singles in with over 3 million total sales, by preaching that "one does not need to be number one" 😂
It probably became so popular coz it did hit a nerve in a Japan which was off the highs of economic growth and in a deflationary spiral back then. The song did offer motivation that "differentiation" will see us through.
Back to 2026, this same context has become increasingly relevant to BRAND VISIBILITY in the age of AI. Traditional search rewarded brands that could win the race to the top of Google. But AI is disrupting that model: being ranked #1 is no longer a guarantee of being the brand that gets noticed, recommended or remembered.
A recent Ahrefs Brand Radar study by Louise L. and Xibeijia Guan analyzing 15,000 prompts (its not exhaustive, but still directional) revealed a surprisingly low 12% overlap between URLs cited across AI platforms and top-ten Google search results. ChatGPT showed even less correlation with a mere 8% overlap for both Google and Bing, despite evidence that its grounded search relies on top search parameters. Perplexity led LLMs with a 28% Google and 14% Bing overlap, while overall AI platform overlap with Bing sat at just 10%. Unsurprisingly, Google’s own AI Overviews bucked the trend entirely, matching top-ten Google rankings 76% of the time.
Think about it. Until now brands could pay their way thru the system to buy and bid on keywords and pay the top dollar to be number one. All was about ranking in Google, ranking inside marketplaces like Amazon, Flipkarts, Rakuten etc etc. No more. consumers have shifted to intent based queries and LLMs are heavily pulling in content from Reddit, YouTube transcripts, niche forums, and industry review sites, surfaces where most enterprise SEO teams have little to no leverage. This is exactly why GEO strategy needs a different approach beyond keywords, PR and third-party content plans.
When AI-mediates between the brand and the consumer, brands will need more than polished, repetitive and endlessly repurposed communication. They need distinctive signals. Things they genuinely do, create, believe in or stand for, that make them recognisably different. That is what SMAP was saying when the said that be different, differentiate. That requires going back to the BRAND PURPOSE & IDENTITY. That was the part of my presentation at the Visionary Breakfast session at the Bulgari Hotel to 40+ marketers from top Japanese enterprises.
Brands cannot simply invent “distinctive signals” because they want AI to notice them. The real work starts with the brand itself. What does it believe in? What does it want to be known for? Products, technology, customer experience, people and content should all reinforce that same idea. When they do, the signals feel authentic because they are evidence of what the brand actually is.
Nissan is a good example. Its long standing idea of “Driving innovation to enrich people's lives” has been expressed through electric vehicles and autonomous driving. Today, that story is evolving around electrification and AI driven mobility. Nissan has not simply talked about these things. It has spent years building them, giving both people and AI a reason to associate Nissan with them. So every page, every experience that they have on their site, any digital touchpoint should link back to this basic principle. Any other signals leads to VISIBILITY DRIFT AND BRAND DILUTION.
So my solution to achieve SMAP's ONLY ONE is as below
Nissan: Its umbrella idea is innovation that enriches people's lives. EVs, e-POWER, ProPILOT, autonomous driving and AI enabled mobility become distinctive signals of that idea. The strength is that Nissan has spent years actually building these technologies, giving the brand evidence behind its positioning.
Patagonia: Its umbrella idea is business in service of the planet. Repair, Worn Wear, environmental activism, durable products and its ownership structure all reinforce that belief. Sustainability is not something Patagonia simply communicates. It is embedded in how the company operates.
IKEA: Its umbrella idea is creating a better everyday life for the many. Democratic design, flat pack furniture, self assembly, affordability and the distinctive store experience all point in the same direction. The product, price and business model tell essentially the same story.
Dyson: Its umbrella idea is engineering led reinvention. Cyclonic technology, cordless products, air treatment and hair technology are all expressions of that obsession. With Dyson, the technology itself has become part of the brand.
LEGO: Its umbrella idea is creativity through play. The brick, LEGO Education, robotics, LEGO Ideas and its enormous fan community all reinforce the same behaviour: building, imagining and creating. It is difficult to separate LEGO from that idea.
ONLY ONE → Identity → Distinctive signals → AI visibility
The really interesting question for marketers now is “What is the one thing our brand should be uniquely associated with, and does the brand have enough authentic evidence across the ecosystem for AI to recognise it?” And hence that bonsai at Bulgari suddenly becomes a good metaphor for my idea. Bulgari had all the expected signals of luxury. The bonsai was the unexpected, authentic signal of Japanese identity. It wasn't competing to be NUMBER ONE. It was simply the ONLY ONE.