Personal Experiment with Adobe Brand Visibility & GEO
I used Adobe Brand Visibility on my hobby project, ExperienceTokyo.Net. Sharing the GEO related learnings.
I used Adobe Brand Visibility on my hobby project, ExperienceTokyo.Net. Sharing the GEO related learnings.
I started documenting my travel experiences in Japan around 2014. Experiencetokyo.net the portal, I started with passion, got great traffic in 2-3 years. I planned to scale more content, and but obviously needed to understand market trends and traveller intent. For topic ideas, I started using Google Trends. Google was the defacto gatekeeper, consumers used to type at best three keywords and although it was difficult to understand the intent, it gave some idea of what customers were seeking. That is still valuable, even today, but the consumption patterns have shifted. Search has not died, Search just multiplied beyond Google with LLMs who now generate AI summaries and more than 50% the consumers already use AI powered search as per McKinsey. Not because Mckinsey says or predicts, but my own Analytics report shows similar trends. Since today morning Organic Search has been 88 sessions, while AI Assistant is 77! Its quite a jump in these past few days, normal ranges are 80-20 (80% organic, direct, social and 20% AI Assistant as of August 2026). That is still 20% and I think if I compare it to a year back (less than 2%, the shift is CLEAR and REAL)
I will need to give one example. I wrote an article on Tokyo Tower many years back (around 2016) or so. Now before AI, or even today that article keeps getting similar traffic and I do not see a drop to be honest. Now an article on Tokyo Tower will be one among millions in this world and I had to differentiate back then too. Thanks to a business trip (Nissan headquarters in Paris, Europe), I visited Paris for the first time in my life, and outside the Adobe office at Trocadero, I had the Eiffel Tower, right there. The tower was so similar to Tokyo Tower on actual experience that, I thought I should make a comaprison content on these two towers. Back then I had checked Google Trends and "Eiffel tower Tokyo tower" was a keyword search in thousands!! So the need was there but most blogs were providing content on architectural details. I decide to flip that and differentiate to get noticed. Here is a 4 STEP Strategy
Back in the days bidding on keywords and paying Google got you the rank 1 on Google Search Page was the SEO best practice. But I had no money to blow and what I could do was to think creatively and differentiate from the crowd. Fast forward to today, this differentiation in todays LLM world needs creative thinking. It is no more a luxury, creative thinking is a necessity. Commodity signals will get filtered and only differentiating content will be visible ( E-E-A-T framework), with a UNIQUE value proposition.
The reason why my site experiencetokyo.net was originally at rank 1 for "Eiffel Tower vs Tokyo Tower" was that my article was exhaustive in its treatment. ORIGINAL comparative photography, researched effort of the two towers made it a "this is not copy paste commodity content", but original. See the below image "Cherry blossoms at both the tower locations". These kind of comparative photostory set the tone. Original content and finding patterns beyond regular destination review. Details on how the cherry blossoms got there at Trocadero etc. The photo story is so detailed that AI instead of recreating the whole album at its end, finds it convenient to actually send the user to my site. Thats a WIN. The complete article is here
Once you have a figured out what unique content you want to communicate, check if the topic has resonance online. You can do this step either before step 1 or as a step 2 since you can get resonance data first and work back to what content you can create, or start with human serendepity and check if there is a market for it. Your choice. So I started my Adobe Brand Visibility console and checked if the Tokyo Tower vs Eiffel Tower is still a thing. See what I got on the dashboard.
(1) Related topics AI volume : 8,681,894 !!
(2) Unique Topics : 1,000
(3) Unique Prompts : 34,417!
So the topic was still a thing! Inside Adobe Brand Visibility Prompt Research menu (which is powered by SEMRUSH) what is shown is MARKET INTELLIGENCE data. It is a combination of 800+ million domains scrapped, 300 million plus prompts (every growing) which is MARKET INTELLIGENCE AT SCALE
I still get traffic on the Tokyo Tower vs Eiffel Tower article. But, I need to know if that is because the article is cited inside LLMs? Say for example ChatGPT, Gemini do they acknowledge my article? As you can see below, Adobe Brand Visibility tells me that Quora and my site ExperienceTokyo.NET are the primary sources to respond to a query on the two towers! Rank number one on Google, but also provide unique content, which is useful for the consumer, and that is the secret sauce for LLMs to cite a content piece!
Please note that Adobe Brand Visibility is a validity tool not something where your authoring journey begins. It is HUMAN SERENDEPITY which still plays a role on what we choose to emphasize, which patterns we choose to surface and I personally would NEVER let AI get in my way to define that. I am not a Human In The Loop guy at all. I am a Human In The Driver Seat believer.
So once you have differentiating content like the Tokyo Tower - Eiffel Tower example, then comes the point of how one can continuously track the topics related to it and make sure that you are citated and recommended. You can see that ABV (Adobe Brand Visibility) shows the prompts, whcih should be used to track this particular topic. It can be set across the model Gemini, ChatGPT and also Google AI Mode. Yes Google AI Mode is again a separate engine and has a more condensed structure and my site is still not being citated there. I need to figure a way out.
Last but not the least. Content workflows have to add one more extra step now.
You might do the heavy lifting and make sure that you have done all the work, but ask a question, "IS YOUR SITE READABLE?". No I do not mean readable by your users or consumers. I mean readable by AI Agent itself. I always make sure that the Adobe Brand Visibility powered AI Content Visibility Checker is always showing 100% readability. It means no content is in a format where AI is unable to understand the structure or the internals.
I believe that providing unique differntiated ONLY ONE content is the basic foundation for content strategy
But validating if you are on track with Adobe Brand Visibility provides a framework to understand if the experience / content resonated well by checking your AI Citation dashboard. Equally important is optimizing your content readability for AI visibility is CRITICAL. Net-net you need to make Content Visible and use a Visibility checker like the one above in todays content review workflow. Hopefully this article inspires you to look at the four stepped process. Just a summary
"ONLY ONE" Content Strategy : Differentiate
Validation via Adobe Brand Visibility Prompt Research
Adobe Brand Visibility : Sources
Content Readability! AI Content Visibility Checker plugin for Chrome
If you have questions, perspectives or comments, do reach out to manish.prabhune@gmail.com
McKinsey & Company “New front door to the internet: Winning in the age of AI search”
McKinsey estimates that about half of consumers use AI-powered search and that AI-powered discovery could influence $750 billion in revenue by 2028.
McKinsey & Company
Pew Research Center “Google users are less likely to click on links when an AI summary appears in the results”
Analysis of 68,879 Google searches, including click behavior when AI summaries appeared.
Pew Research Center
Adobe Experience League “Adobe Brand Visibility best practices”
Adobe's definition of LLM Optimization/GEO and the role of visibility and retrieval in AI-generated answers.
Adobe Brand Visibility
Google Search Central “AI features and your website”
Google's guidance on how AI Overviews and AI Mode interact with websites and existing SEO practices.
Google Search Central
Google “5 new ways to explore the web with generative AI in Search”
Google's 2026 description of how AI Search is increasingly connecting users with original content, deeper articles and web sources.
Google Search